But I have no idea if the wardrobe works.
How Many Outfits Do I Actually Have?
First, I asked AI to help me run every combination.
It came up with 560 unique combinations from 17 pieces.
1. bra + ao dai bottom + denim jacket
2. bra + ao ba ba bottom + denim jacket
3. bra + ao dai bottom + wool jacket
4. bra + ao ba ba bottom + wool jacket
5. cashmere + ao dai bottom
6. cashmere + ao ba ba bottom
7. ao ba ba top + ao dai bottom
8. ao ba ba top + ao ba ba bottom
9. ao dai top + ao dai bottom
10. ao dai top + ao ba ba bottom
11. cotton blouse + denim pinafore
12. linen blouse + denim pinafore
13. silk blouse + denim pinafore
14. cashmere + denim pinafore
15. ao ba ba top + denim pinafore
16. ao dai top + denim pinafore
17. cotton blouse + wool pinafore
18. linen blouse + wool pinafore
19. silk blouse + wool pinafore
20. cashmere + wool pinafore
…
549. cotton blouse + ao dai bottom + denim jacket + snow coat
550. cotton blouse + ao ba ba bottom + denim jacket + snow coat
551. cotton blouse + denim pinafore + denim jacket + snow coat
552. cotton blouse + wool pinafore + denim jacket + snow coat
553. cotton blouse + ao dai bottom + wool jacket + snow coat
554. cotton blouse + ao ba ba bottom + wool jacket + snow coat
555. cotton blouse + denim pinafore + wool jacket + snow coat
556. cotton blouse + wool pinafore + denim jacket + snow coat
557. cotton blouse + ao dai bottom + cashmere + snow coat
558. cotton blouse + ao ba ba bottom + cashmere + snow coat
559. cotton blouse + denim pinafore + cashmere + snow coat
560. cotton blouse + wool pinafore + cashmere + snow coat
I would take the number 560 with a grain of salt.
But even if AI got half wrong:
17 pieces → 280 combinations.
That’s a lot of outfits but it still doesn’t tell me whether I have the right pieces.
I could have 560 outfits and nothing to wear.
I need a different test.
The stress test
I don’t sit still for very long.
I could be anywhere doing anything: biking the Netherlands even though I can’t ride a bike because I made a promise to a friend, hauling a hopefully cursed molcajete back from Oaxaca, or taking my parents back to Vietnam before it’s too late.
I emailed Beaux-Arts Nantes a year ago.
No response.
I’m considering showing up in person.
Too many places for a lifetime, and yet something can happen tomorrow that pulls me in a completely different direction.
I need clothes that can follow me anywhere, on zero notice, for reasons I haven’t thought of yet.
I tested the wardrobe against three spectrums:
- Formality: Can the wardrobe take me from can’t be bothered to black tie?
- Temperature: Can the wardrobe handle 10°F/-12°C to 108°F/42°C?
- Activity: Can the wardrobe support me from becoming furniture to maximum exertion?
Every time the wardrobe failed, I marked the missing capability as a gap.
Let’s see what broke.
SPECTRUM 1: Casual → Formal
Level 1. Can’t be Bothered

Level 2. Casual Errands

Level 3. Smart Casual

Level 4. Dressed up

Level 5. My Wedding

Level 6. Black Tie Event
Result: 2 Gaps
SPECTRUM 2: Extremely Hot → Extremely Cold
Extremely Hot 108°F / 42°C

Hot 85°F / 29°C

Las Vegas, NV

Mild — 68°F / 20°C
Cold 30°F / -1°C

Extremely cold — 10°F / -12°C
Result: 3 More Gaps
SPECTRUM 3: Sedentary → Activity
Sedentary

Low Activity
Light Movement

Moderate Movement

Active

Vigorous

Maximum exertion
I found seven gaps
FORMALITY
WEATHER
DOING THINGS
Now that I see them all together:
Two of the gaps are weather extremes beyond the thermal capacities of the materials I’m working with.
One is a very formal situation with its own very specific language.
But look at the other four.
HALF OF THE GAPS ARE WORK CLOTHES
I HAVE NO WORK CLOTHES.
Why do I have no work clothes?
The wardrobe can go to Paris.
It can go to Buenos Aires.
It can go to the Mekong Delta.
It can go to Oaxaca.
It can go from 108°F to 30°F.
It can do casual → formal.
It can dance.
It can museum.
It can wedding.
But: I need to paint a wall.
X.
Why?
Merriam-Webster defines wardrobe as:
Wardrobe (noun)
Merriam-Webster
a : a collection of wearing apparel (as of one person or for one activity) — “a summer wardrobe”
Yet culturally, when we talk about someone’s wardrobe, we usually mean:
the clothes they’re seen in.
Not:
the clothes they use to do things.
No Famous Dead Designer.
or Famous Living Designer.
or capsule wardrobe guide.
or runway collection seems particularly interested in budgeting a slot for: Shirt I Paint In.
Painting Shirt isn’t glamorous.
It doesn’t get photographed.
It doesn’t get taken to dinner.
It doesn’t get complimented.
So shove it into another category:
Tool
And suddenly clothing gets divided into two categories:
Fashion vs Equipment
That’s such a strange distinction from a making perspective because they are both garments built around the same body, solving the same basic problem:
- What does this body have to do?
- What does this garment need to survive while the body is doing it?
Chanel Suit and Painting Shirt have different jobs socially but structurally, they are the same thing.
Same making process, slightly different materials.
I have clothes for being somewhere.
Now I need clothes for doing something.
Let’s build the other half.